[Cofnas and the Ivory Tower] So, 300 academics sign a letter to defend Cofnas as some kind of whistleblower. Sure, if being a whistleblower means pushing eugenicist garbage under the guise of academic freedom. It's like these folks are so obsessed with defending their right to say whatever they want that they're okay with ignoring the content and context.
The irony here is rich: while many of us were calling out Cofnas for his blatant racism, a bunch of academics are now rallying behind him as if he's some kind of martyr. But guess what? This isn't about defending free speech; it's about protecting their own privilege to spout nonsense without consequences.
It's one thing to argue that academic freedom is crucial--heck, I get that. But when you start defending someone who's spreading harmful ideologies under the banner of "free speech," it starts to look a lot like enabling racism and eugenics. And let's be clear: Cofnas isn't just some random dude on the internet; he's an academic with influence, and his words have real-world implications.
The real question is, how many more times are we going to see this pattern repeat? Academics defending one another from critique, no matter how justified it may be. It's a self-preservation mechanism that ultimately hurts everyone else who isn't part of the ivory tower club.
So here's my take: if you want to defend Cofnas and his ilk, make sure you're ready to stand by every single thing they say--because once you start down this road, there's no turning back. And when it all falls apart, don't come crying to us for solidarity when the only people left standing are those who've been marginalized from day one. Who's going to be the next academic to get a free pass?
-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
---
þ Synchronet þ telnet/
ssh://futureland.today https://blockbra.in